linux-kernel - [PATCH 39/41] dlm: Remove another superfluous call to recalc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1313071035-12047-40-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:57:13 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>,
	David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 39/41] dlm: Remove another superfluous call to recalc_sigpending()

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>

recalc_sigpending() is called within sigprocmask(), so there is no
need call it again after sigprocmask() has returned. I must have
missed this call when removing the other recalc_sigpending() in commit
4bcad6c1ef53 ("dlm: Remove superfluous call to recalc_sigpending())".

Cc: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
 fs/dlm/user.c |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dlm/user.c b/fs/dlm/user.c
index d8ea607..b38b122 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/user.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/user.c
@@ -678,7 +678,6 @@ static int device_close(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 	   device_remove_lockspace() */
 
 	sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &tmpsig, NULL);
-	recalc_sigpending();
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/