[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1313071035-12047-20-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:56:53 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 19/41] OpenRISC: No need to reset handler if SA_ONESHOT
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if
SA_ONESHOT is set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again
in handle_signal(). Furthermore, because we were modifying
ka->sa.sa_handler without holding ->sighand->siglock there's the
potential we can race with another thread if it modifies the signal
handlers.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
index c023db9..2f75e74 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -267,9 +267,6 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig,
{
setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
- if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONESHOT)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(¤t->blocked, ¤t->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists