linux-kernel - [PATCH 20/41] OpenRISC: Don't mask signals if we fail to setup signal stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1313071035-12047-21-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:56:54 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 20/41] OpenRISC: Don't mask signals if we fail to setup signal stack

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>

setup_rt_frame() needs to return an indication of whether it succeeded
or failed in setting up the signal stack frame. If setup_rt_frame()
fails then we must not modify current->blocked.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
 arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
index 2f75e74..b0bdfda 100644
--- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/signal.c
@@ -196,8 +196,8 @@ static inline void __user *get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka,
  * trampoline which performs the syscall sigreturn, or a provided
  * user-mode trampoline.
  */
-static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
-			   sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static int setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
+			  sigset_t *set, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 	struct rt_sigframe *frame;
 	unsigned long return_ip;
@@ -254,18 +254,23 @@ static void setup_rt_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
 	/* actually move the usp to reflect the stacked frame */
 	regs->sp = (unsigned long)frame;
 
-	return;
+	return 0;
 
 give_sigsegv:
 	force_sigsegv(sig, current);
+	return -EFAULT;
 }
 
-static inline void
+static inline int
 handle_signal(unsigned long sig,
 	      siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
 	      sigset_t *oldset, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-	setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, info, oldset, regs);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
 	sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
@@ -274,6 +279,8 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig,
 	recalc_sigpending();
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -362,13 +369,13 @@ void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs)
 			oldset = &current->blocked;
 
 		/* Whee!  Actually deliver the signal.  */
-		handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs);
-		/* a signal was successfully delivered; the saved
-		 * sigmask will have been stored in the signal frame,
-		 * and will be restored by sigreturn, so we can simply
-		 * clear the TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK flag */
-		if (test_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK))
+		if (!handle_signal(signr, &info, &ka, oldset, regs)) {
+			/* a signal was successfully delivered; the saved
+			 * sigmask will have been stored in the signal frame,
+			 * and will be restored by sigreturn, so we can simply
+			 * clear the TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK flag */
 			clear_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK);
+		}
 
 		tracehook_signal_handler(signr, &info, &ka, regs,
 					 test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP));
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/