[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1313071035-12047-14-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:56:47 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Subject: [PATCH 13/41] microblaze: No need to reset handler if SA_ONESHOT
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
get_signal_to_deliver() already resets the signal handler if
SA_ONESHOT is set in ka->sa.sa_flags, there's no need to do it again
in handle_signal(). Furthermore, because we were modifying
ka->sa.sa_handler without holding ->sighand->siglock there's the
potential we can race with another thread if it modifies the signal
handlers.
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
index 90de06d..9e749c0 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/signal.c
@@ -320,9 +320,6 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
else
setup_rt_frame(sig, ka, NULL, oldset, regs);
- if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONESHOT)
- ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
-
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(¤t->blocked,
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists