[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110811141630.GA24704@srcf.ucam.org>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:16:30 +0100
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To:	Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@...i.ir>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@...oraproject.org>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Ali Gholami Rudi <aliqrudi@...il.com>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
	Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: missing acpi backlight bisected to 9661e92c10
Well, that all looks fine. And I also can't see any way that this commit
could cause the backlight not to appear - all it does is set the parent 
if it's present. There's no new path that could cause it to return 
early. Does reverting this patch really make things work?
-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists