[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110811141630.GA24704@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:16:30 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@...i.ir>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
Michel Alexandre Salim <salimma@...oraproject.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Ali Gholami Rudi <aliqrudi@...il.com>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: missing acpi backlight bisected to 9661e92c10
Well, that all looks fine. And I also can't see any way that this commit
could cause the backlight not to appear - all it does is set the parent
if it's present. There's no new path that could cause it to return
early. Does reverting this patch really make things work?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists