[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1108111056540.1958-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:59:10 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
cc: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>, <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
<roland@...estorage.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] Oops when SCSI device under multipath is removed
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> > If the reason you moved scsi_free_queue into scsi_remove_device
> > is marking the queue dead, how about the following patch?
> > Do you think it's acceptable?
>
> Well, it's just hiding the problem. The essential problem is that only
> block has the correctly refcounted knowledge to know the last release of
> the queue reference. Until that time, the holder of the reference can
> use the queue regardless of whether blk_cleanup_queue() has been called.
> This is the race you complain about since use of the queue involves the
> lock which should be guarded by QUEUE_DEAD checks.
>
> This is essentially unfixable with function calls. The only way to fix
> it is to have a callback model for freeing the external lock.
Assuming the queue is associated with a device, the queue could take a
reference to the device, dropping that reference when the queue is
freed. Then the lock could safely be freed at the same time as the
device.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists