linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix a couple of minor portability issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+a=Yy4PorPNqiBqakmHL2s5rWNR7nKN3mf5BbV++eXsBbL9Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:17:06 +0800
From:	Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
To:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix a couple of minor portability issues

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> wrote:
> Building on tilepro revealed two minor portability issues: the
> blocklayout.c file used prefetchw() without #include <linux/prefetch.h>,
> and the nfs4filelayout.c file used do_div() on an s64 not a u64.
> This change fixes those two issues so the NFS code builds on tilepro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c |    1 +
>  fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c          |    6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> index e56564d..9561c8f 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include <linux/namei.h>
>  #include <linux/bio.h>         /* struct bio */
>  #include <linux/buffer_head.h> /* various write calls */
> +#include <linux/prefetch.h>
This is already fixed in Trond's nfs-for-next branch by commit 88c9e4219.

>
>  #include "blocklayout.h"
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
> index e8915d4..6976a72 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
> @@ -48,13 +48,13 @@ filelayout_get_dense_offset(struct nfs4_filelayout_segment *flseg,
>                            loff_t offset)
>  {
>        u32 stripe_width = flseg->stripe_unit * flseg->dsaddr->stripe_count;
> -       u64 tmp;
> +       u64 tmp, uoff;
>
>        offset -= flseg->pattern_offset;
> -       tmp = offset;
> +       tmp = uoff = offset;
>        do_div(tmp, stripe_width);
>
> -       return tmp * flseg->stripe_unit + do_div(offset, flseg->stripe_unit);
> +       return tmp * flseg->stripe_unit + do_div(uoff, flseg->stripe_unit);
>  }
>
>  /* This function is used by the layout driver to calculate the
> --
> 1.6.5.2
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>



-- 
Thanks,
-Bergwolf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/