[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313087423.8491.11.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:30:23 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] new cpumask for hotpluggable CPUs
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 13:03 -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> This patch series introduces a new cpumask which tracks CPUs that
> support hotplugging. The purpose of this patch series is to provide a
> simple method for kernel code to know which CPUs can be hotplugged and
> which ones cannot. Potential users of this code might be a thermal
> mitigation technique which uses hotplug to lower temperature, or a power
> capping mechanism which uses hotplug to lower power consumption.
>
> All the of usual cpumask helper functions are created for this new mask.
> The second patch in this series simply sets the bit for elligible CPUs
> while they are being registered. The cpumask itself is static after
> boot and should not change (like the possbile mask).
I still most strongly object to people using hotplug for these goals.
Why do you need to go through the entire dance of hotplug just to idle a
cpu? Hotplug not only idles the cpu but tears down (and rebuilds) an
insane amount of resources associated with the cpu.
Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists