[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E4422FD.3060706@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 11:44:13 -0700
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...ian.com>,
Sorin Faibish <sfaibish@....com>,
peter honeyman <honey@...i.umich.edu>
CC: <tao.peng@....com>, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<rdunlap@...otime.net>, <bergwolf@...il.com>,
<Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>, <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"Welch, Brent" <welch@...asas.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.1-rc1 (nfs/pnfs and drivers/md)
On 08/11/2011 03:11 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> On 2011-08-11 06:26, tao.peng@....com wrote:
>
> My Ack, that's indeed closer to what I had queued in my tree originally and
> follows the approach we used for the objects layout driver.
>
> Benny
>
Yes but this breaks "Sorin"'s conspiracy to sneak into readhat the block
layout driver. Because it would be selected automatically if you set
CONFIG_NFS41.
Because for some perverted reason readhat wants pNFS-Files in, with
latest patches, but not the blocks or objects. I liked it that Blocks
tried to state: "pNFS is with blocks as well". Even Trond agreed that
it is logical this way.
You select CONFIG_NFS41 or not. objects and blocks are a part of that,
mandated by the protocol.
(I don't know that it was "Sorin"'s Idea, I meant the block guys)
I wish we can go back to the auto selection but fix the dependency
stuff. Surly it is possible.
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists