Message-ID: <4E434928.9020304@hitachi.com>
Date:	Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:14:48 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH][3.0] Tracepoint: dissociate from module mutex (v2)

(2011/08/11 4:18), Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Copy the information needed from struct module into a local module list
> held within tracepoint.c from within the module coming/going notifier.
> 
> This vastly simplifies locking of tracepoint registration /
> unregistration, because we don't have to take the module mutex to
> register and unregister tracepoints anymore. Steven Rostedt ran into
> dependency problems related to modules mutex vs kprobes mutex vs ftrace
> mutex vs tracepoint mutex that seems to be hard to fix without removing
> this dependency between tracepoint and module mutex. (note: it should be
> investigated whether kprobes could benefit of being dissociated from the
> modules mutex too.)

Thanks, it seems that kprobes has already mostly done that.
It holds module_mutex only in kprobe_optimizer. However,
it seems meaningless, because kprobe_mutex already protects
kprobe_optimizer against the kprobes module notifier.
Thus, a module removing will stays on the notifier until
the optimizer runs out. So I think we can remove that mutex lock.

> 
> This also fixes module handling of tracepoint list iterators, because it
> was expecting the list to be sorted by pointer address. Given we have
> control on our own list now, it's OK to sort this list which has
> tracepoints as its only purpose. The reason why this sorting is required
> is to handle the fact that seq files (and any read() operation from
> user-space) cannot hold the tracepoint mutex across multiple calls, so
> list entries may vanish between calls. With sorting, the tracepoint
> iterator becomes usable even if the list don't contain the exact item
> pointed to by the iterator anymore.

Anyway, your patch also looks good to me too;)

Thank you,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> CC: tglx@...utronix.de
> CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/module.h     |   12 ---
>  include/linux/tracepoint.h |   25 ++----
>  kernel/module.c            |   47 ------------
>  kernel/tracepoint.c        |  169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  4 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/tracepoint.h
> @@ -54,8 +54,18 @@ extern int tracepoint_probe_unregister_n
>  						void *data);
>  extern void tracepoint_probe_update_all(void);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +struct tp_module {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	unsigned int num_tracepoints;
> +	struct tracepoint * const *tracepoints_ptrs;
> +};
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +
>  struct tracepoint_iter {
> -	struct module *module;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +	struct tp_module *module;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>  	struct tracepoint * const *tracepoint;
>  };
>  
> @@ -63,8 +73,6 @@ extern void tracepoint_iter_start(struct
>  extern void tracepoint_iter_next(struct tracepoint_iter *iter);
>  extern void tracepoint_iter_stop(struct tracepoint_iter *iter);
>  extern void tracepoint_iter_reset(struct tracepoint_iter *iter);
> -extern int tracepoint_get_iter_range(struct tracepoint * const **tracepoint,
> -	struct tracepoint * const *begin, struct tracepoint * const *end);
>  
>  /*
>   * tracepoint_synchronize_unregister must be called between the last tracepoint
> @@ -78,17 +86,6 @@ static inline void tracepoint_synchroniz
>  
>  #define PARAMS(args...) args
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> -extern
> -void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
> -	struct tracepoint * const *end);
> -#else
> -static inline
> -void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
> -	struct tracepoint * const *end)
> -{ }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS */
> -
>  #endif /* _LINUX_TRACEPOINT_H */
>  
>  /*
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/module.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/module.c
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3421,50 +3421,3 @@ void module_layout(struct module *mod,
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(module_layout);
>  #endif
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEPOINTS
> -void module_update_tracepoints(void)
> -{
> -	struct module *mod;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> -	list_for_each_entry(mod, &modules, list)
> -		if (!mod->taints)
> -			tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> -				mod->tracepoints_ptrs + mod->num_tracepoints);
> -	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> -}
> -
> -/*
> - * Returns 0 if current not found.
> - * Returns 1 if current found.
> - */
> -int module_get_iter_tracepoints(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
> -{
> -	struct module *iter_mod;
> -	int found = 0;
> -
> -	mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> -	list_for_each_entry(iter_mod, &modules, list) {
> -		if (!iter_mod->taints) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Sorted module list
> -			 */
> -			if (iter_mod < iter->module)
> -				continue;
> -			else if (iter_mod > iter->module)
> -				iter->tracepoint = NULL;
> -			found = tracepoint_get_iter_range(&iter->tracepoint,
> -				iter_mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> -				iter_mod->tracepoints_ptrs
> -					+ iter_mod->num_tracepoints);
> -			if (found) {
> -				iter->module = iter_mod;
> -				break;
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> -	return found;
> -}
> -#endif
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/tracepoint.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -34,11 +34,16 @@ extern struct tracepoint * const __stop_
>  static const int tracepoint_debug;
>  
>  /*
> - * tracepoints_mutex nests inside module_mutex. Tracepoints mutex protects the
> - * builtin and module tracepoints and the hash table.
> + * Tracepoints mutex protects the builtin and module tracepoints and the hash
> + * table, as well as the local module list.
>   */
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracepoints_mutex);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +/* Local list of struct module */
> +static LIST_HEAD(tracepoint_module_list);
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +
>  /*
>   * Tracepoint hash table, containing the active tracepoints.
>   * Protected by tracepoints_mutex.
> @@ -292,9 +297,10 @@ static void disable_tracepoint(struct tr
>   * @end: end of the range
>   *
>   * Updates the probe callback corresponding to a range of tracepoints.
> + * Called with tracepoints_mutex held.
>   */
> -void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
> -				   struct tracepoint * const *end)
> +static void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struct tracepoint * const *begin,
> +					  struct tracepoint * const *end)
>  {
>  	struct tracepoint * const *iter;
>  	struct tracepoint_entry *mark_entry;
> @@ -302,7 +308,6 @@ void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struc
>  	if (!begin)
>  		return;
>  
> -	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	for (iter = begin; iter < end; iter++) {
>  		mark_entry = get_tracepoint((*iter)->name);
>  		if (mark_entry) {
> @@ -312,11 +317,27 @@ void tracepoint_update_probe_range(struc
>  			disable_tracepoint(*iter);
>  		}
>  	}
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +void module_update_tracepoints(void)
> +{
> +	struct tp_module *tp_mod;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(tp_mod, &tracepoint_module_list, list)
> +		tracepoint_update_probe_range(tp_mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> +			tp_mod->tracepoints_ptrs + tp_mod->num_tracepoints);
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +void module_update_tracepoints(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +
> +
>  /*
>   * Update probes, removing the faulty probes.
> + * Called with tracepoints_mutex held.
>   */
>  static void tracepoint_update_probes(void)
>  {
> @@ -359,11 +380,12 @@ int tracepoint_probe_register(const char
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	old = tracepoint_add_probe(name, probe, data);
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	if (IS_ERR(old))
> +	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  		return PTR_ERR(old);
> -
> +	}
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	release_probes(old);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -402,11 +424,12 @@ int tracepoint_probe_unregister(const ch
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	old = tracepoint_remove_probe(name, probe, data);
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -	if (IS_ERR(old))
> +	if (IS_ERR(old)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  		return PTR_ERR(old);
> -
> +	}
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();		/* may update entry */
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	release_probes(old);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -489,9 +512,8 @@ void tracepoint_probe_update_all(void)
>  	if (!list_empty(&old_probes))
>  		list_replace_init(&old_probes, &release_probes);
>  	need_update = 0;
> -	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> -
>  	tracepoint_update_probes();
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(pos, next, &release_probes, u.list) {
>  		list_del(&pos->u.list);
>  		call_rcu_sched(&pos->u.rcu, rcu_free_old_probes);
> @@ -509,7 +531,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_probe_updat
>   * Will return the first tracepoint in the range if the input tracepoint is
>   * NULL.
>   */
> -int tracepoint_get_iter_range(struct tracepoint * const **tracepoint,
> +static int tracepoint_get_iter_range(struct tracepoint * const **tracepoint,
>  	struct tracepoint * const *begin, struct tracepoint * const *end)
>  {
>  	if (!*tracepoint && begin != end) {
> @@ -520,11 +542,12 @@ int tracepoint_get_iter_range(struct tra
>  		return 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_get_iter_range);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>  static void tracepoint_get_iter(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
>  {
>  	int found = 0;
> +	struct tp_module *iter_mod;
>  
>  	/* Core kernel tracepoints */
>  	if (!iter->module) {
> @@ -534,12 +557,43 @@ static void tracepoint_get_iter(struct t
>  		if (found)
>  			goto end;
>  	}
> -	/* tracepoints in modules. */
> -	found = module_get_iter_tracepoints(iter);
> +	/* Tracepoints in modules */
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	list_for_each_entry(iter_mod, &tracepoint_module_list, list) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Sorted module list
> +		 */
> +		if (iter_mod < iter->module)
> +			continue;
> +		else if (iter_mod > iter->module)
> +			iter->tracepoint = NULL;
> +		found = tracepoint_get_iter_range(&iter->tracepoint,
> +			iter_mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> +			iter_mod->tracepoints_ptrs
> +				+ iter_mod->num_tracepoints);
> +		if (found) {
> +			iter->module = iter_mod;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
>  end:
>  	if (!found)
>  		tracepoint_iter_reset(iter);
>  }
> +#else /* CONFIG_MODULES */
> +static void tracepoint_get_iter(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
> +{
> +	int found = 0;
> +
> +	/* Core kernel tracepoints */
> +	found = tracepoint_get_iter_range(&iter->tracepoint,
> +			__start___tracepoints_ptrs,
> +			__stop___tracepoints_ptrs);
> +	if (!found)
> +		tracepoint_iter_reset(iter);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>  
>  void tracepoint_iter_start(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
>  {
> @@ -566,26 +620,98 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_iter_stop);
>  
>  void tracepoint_iter_reset(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
>  {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
>  	iter->module = NULL;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>  	iter->tracepoint = NULL;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tracepoint_iter_reset);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> +static int tracepoint_module_coming(struct module *mod)
> +{
> +	struct tp_module *tp_mod, *iter;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We skip modules that tain the kernel, especially those with different
> +	 * module header (for forced load), to make sure we don't cause a crash.
> +	 */
> +	if (mod->taints)
> +		return 0;
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	tp_mod = kmalloc(sizeof(struct tp_module), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!tp_mod) {
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto end;
> +	}
> +	tp_mod->num_tracepoints = mod->num_tracepoints;
> +	tp_mod->tracepoints_ptrs = mod->tracepoints_ptrs;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * tracepoint_module_list is kept sorted by struct module pointer
> +	 * address for iteration on tracepoints from a seq_file that can release
> +	 * the mutex between calls.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry_reverse(iter, &tracepoint_module_list, list) {
> +		BUG_ON(iter == tp_mod);	/* Should never be in the list twice */
> +		if (iter < tp_mod) {
> +			/* We belong to the location right after iter. */
> +			list_add(&tp_mod->list, &iter->list);
> +			goto module_added;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/* We belong to the beginning of the list */
> +	list_add(&tp_mod->list, &tracepoint_module_list);
> +module_added:
> +	tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> +		mod->tracepoints_ptrs + mod->num_tracepoints);
> +end:
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int tracepoint_module_going(struct module *mod)
> +{
> +	struct tp_module *pos;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> +		mod->tracepoints_ptrs + mod->num_tracepoints);
> +	list_for_each_entry(pos, &tracepoint_module_list, list) {
> +		if (pos->tracepoints_ptrs == mod->tracepoints_ptrs) {
> +			list_del(&pos->list);
> +			kfree(pos);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * In the case of modules that were tainted at "coming", we'll simply
> +	 * walk through the list without finding it. We cannot use the "tainted"
> +	 * flag on "going", in case a module taints the kernel only after being
> +	 * loaded.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_unlock(&tracepoints_mutex);
> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
>  int tracepoint_module_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>  			     unsigned long val, void *data)
>  {
>  	struct module *mod = data;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	switch (val) {
>  	case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
> +		ret = tracepoint_module_coming(mod);
> +		break;
> +	case MODULE_STATE_LIVE:
> +		break;
>  	case MODULE_STATE_GOING:
> -		tracepoint_update_probe_range(mod->tracepoints_ptrs,
> -			mod->tracepoints_ptrs + mod->num_tracepoints);
> +		ret = tracepoint_module_going(mod);
>  		break;
>  	}
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  struct notifier_block tracepoint_module_nb = {
> @@ -598,7 +724,6 @@ static int init_tracepoints(void)
>  	return register_module_notifier(&tracepoint_module_nb);
>  }
>  __initcall(init_tracepoints);
> -
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINTS
> Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/module.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/linux/module.h
> +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -578,9 +578,6 @@ int unregister_module_notifier(struct no
>  
>  extern void print_modules(void);
>  
> -extern void module_update_tracepoints(void);
> -extern int module_get_iter_tracepoints(struct tracepoint_iter *iter);
> -
>  #else /* !CONFIG_MODULES... */
>  #define EXPORT_SYMBOL(sym)
>  #define EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sym)
> @@ -696,15 +693,6 @@ static inline int unregister_module_noti
>  static inline void print_modules(void)
>  {
>  }
> -
> -static inline void module_update_tracepoints(void)
> -{
> -}
> -
> -static inline int module_get_iter_tracepoints(struct tracepoint_iter *iter)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_MODULES */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> 


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists