[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108110010220.23622@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@...oo.com>
cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"\"\"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org\"\"" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"\"linux-mm@...ck.org\"" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: running of out memory => kernel crash
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Mahmood Naderan wrote:
> >The default behavior is to kill all eligible and unkillable threads until
> >there are none left to sacrifice (i.e. all kthreads and OOM_DISABLE).
>
> In a simple test with virtualbox, I reduced the amount of ram to 300MB.
> Then I ran "swapoff -a" and opened some applications. I noticed that the free
> spaces is kept around 2-3MB and "kswapd" is running. Also I saw that disk
> activity was very high.
> That mean although "swap" partition is turned off, "kswapd" was trying to do
> something. I wonder how that behavior can be explained?
>
Despite it's name, kswapd is still active, it's trying to reclaim memory
to prevent having to kill a process as the last resort.
If /proc/sys/vm/panic_on_oom is not set, as previously mentioned, then
we'll need the kernel log to diagnose this further.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists