[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313142333.6576.8.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:45:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 13:45 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Code is
>
> unsigned long freerun = (thresh + bg_thresh) / 2;
>
> setpoint = (limit + freerun) / 2;
> pos_ratio = abs(dirty - setpoint);
> pos_ratio <<= BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
> do_div(pos_ratio, limit - setpoint + 1);
Why do you use do_div()? from the code those things are unsigned long,
and you can divide that just fine.
Also, there's div64_s64 that can do signed divides for s64 types.
That'll loose the extra conditionals you used for abs and putting the
sign back.
> x = pos_ratio;
> pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
> pos_ratio = pos_ratio * x >> BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
So on 32bit with unsigned long that gets 32=2*(10+b) bits for x, that
solves to 6, which isn't going to be enough I figure since
(dirty-setpoint) !< 64.
So you really need to use u64/s64 types here, unsigned long just won't
do, with u64 you have 64=2(10+b) 22 bits for x, which should fit.
> if (dirty > setpoint)
> pos_ratio = -pos_ratio;
> pos_ratio += 1 << BANDWIDTH_CALC_SHIFT;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists