[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313154504.6576.44.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:08:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 20:59 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:54:17PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 00:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > s - x 3
> > > f(x) := 1 + (-----)
> > > d
> > >
> > btw, if you want steeper slopes for rampup and brake you can add another
> > factor like:
> >
> > s - x 3
> > f(x) := 1 + a(-----)
> > d
> >
> > And solve the whole f(l)=0 thing again to determine d in l and a.
> >
> > For 0 < a < 1 the slopes increase.
>
> Yes, we can leave it as a future tuning option. For now I'm pretty
> satisfied with the current function's shape :)
Oh for sure, it just occurred to me when looking at your plots and
thought I'd at least mention it.. You know something to poke at on a
rainy afternoon ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists