[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313169639.18583.344.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 13:20:39 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] ktest: Introduce PASS_COUNT
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 19:09 +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > How about PASS_THRESHOLD? or PASS_COUNT_THRESHOLD? As I think that may
> > be more descriptive.
>
> PASS_THRESHOLD sounds good. Should I respin with that change now? Or are
> you still considering a different design?
>
Nah, thinking about it more, I don't like PASS_THRESHOLD either. Maybe
we should have a RERUN option. That is, RERUN the test for each
iteration?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists