[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110812144131.59de312ee6e1a9e8865c1a85@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:41:31 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next] spider_net: fix compile issue introduced by driver
move
Hi Jeff,
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:40:14 -0700 Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:33 -0700, Kirsher, Jeffrey T wrote:
> > Both Spider net driver and Sun GEM driver use the sungem_phy.o object.
> > This fix creates a Kconfig object for sungem_phy (like MDIO) so that
> > both drivers require the SUNGEM_PHY object.
> >
> > This has been compile tested for the Sun GEM driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> > drivers/net/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/net/ethernet/sun/Makefile | 3 ++-
> > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Stephen, is it possible for you to try this patch to ensure it resolves
> the compile issue you saw for the Spider Net driver when merging with
> David's net-next tree?
That patch doesn't come close to applying to the copy of Dave's tree I
have from this morning (head e7c379d2a0dc). I'll see if I can figure it
out ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists