linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1313245393.25267.15.camel@twins>
Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:23:13 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11

On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 15:59 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Hohum.  rt10 did change the symptom.  Box no longer gripes at some
> random point while just idling along, now it gripes (and dies as well)
> during boot.
> 
> First boot, it choked on sr0 a wee bit later, second boot here.
> 
> [   40.582256] igb 0000:01:00.1: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection
> [   40.582260] igb 0000:01:00.1: eth1: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x4) 08:00:69:15:c1:d5
> [   40.582335] igb 0000:01:00.1: eth1: PBA No: FFFFFF-0FF
> [   40.582338] igb 0000:01:00.1: Using MSI-X interrupts. 8 rx queue(s), 8 tx queue(s)
> [  100.409012] INFO: rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 21, t=60002 jiffies)
> 
> Guess I should try x3550 M3 or Q6600.  They were griping the same way UV
> box did earlier this morning (with an earlier -rt though), and they make
> much smaller gripes.
> 
> Gripe attached.  Looks a lot like the old gripes to me, just earlier and
> deadlier.  But I don't speak rcu. 

Nothing stands out, but then, I'm tired and it are 32 cpu traces to look
through.

There is definitely something still fishy with RCU, the last patch in
-rt10 is as far as we understand things a complete bandaid at best and
horridly wrong otherwise.

I think I'll try Paul's WARN_ON(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0 &&
t->rcu_read_unlock_special); in __rcu_read_lock() sometime later.

I also haven't read through my IRC backlog in which Paul and Steven
discussed things way after I fell over and got keyboard face. 

/me needs to go out in the rain to get some shopping done, shops in this
country I live in are closed on sunday :/ 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/