linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix non-LPAE boot regression.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHkRjk5aK7kkfpCoTqtwgkM8hjJx5MfD-Z7stXmqyWSz4VE56g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 13 Aug 2011 15:45:25 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix non-LPAE boot regression.

On Saturday, 13 August 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:14:30PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> Thanks for this. The original code was indeed broken but I think the
>> fix should be to use SECTION_SIZE instead of SHIFT. I'll have a look
>> on Monday.
>
> No, the original code is not broken.  Look at what it's doing:

I meant my original LPAE code (though strangely it was booting fine, I
guess it didn't use more than a section from those mappings). I'll
look at the details on Monday, I'm away from my PC now.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/