[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YPr1zzN6UPxMs9UaViej4cLDEU9awd3y=yFnZBSqCu4=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 21:04:21 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: add GENHD_FL_UNPARTITIONABLE
Hello,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 05:32:37PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> There are cases where suppressing partition scan is useful - e.g. for
>> lo devices
>
> Err, partitioning loop devices is extremly useful.
Oh yeah it is. It's to allow toggling it dynamically via losetup
(currently, it's decided by module param). It's part of making lo more
dynamic.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists