linux-kernel - [PATCH 01/10]arch:mips:sibyte:sb1250:setup.c Remove pointless "@" from various parts of the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1313195235-4522-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Aug 2011 17:27:06 -0700
From:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To:	trivial@...nel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10]arch:mips:sibyte:sb1250:setup.c Remove pointless "@" from various parts of the kernel 

From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>

The patch series below removes some pointless "@"'s in various parts of the kernel.
Note: some might be useful, but then again, some just seemed a waste of space.
(and since the kernel is becomeing bloated, might as well diet! even if its a few bits)

Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@...il.com>

---
 arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/setup.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/setup.c b/arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/setup.c
index 92da315..81f9b74 100644
--- a/arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/setup.c
+++ b/arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/setup.c
@@ -202,9 +202,9 @@ void __init sb1250_setup(void)
 	switch (war_pass) {
 	case K_SYS_REVISION_BCM1250_PASS1:
 #ifndef CONFIG_SB1_PASS_1_WORKAROUNDS
-		printk("@@@@ This is a BCM1250 A0-A2 (Pass 1) board, "
+		printk("This is a BCM1250 A0-A2 (Pass 1) board, "
 		            "and the kernel doesn't have the proper "
-		            "workarounds compiled in. @@@@\n");
+		            "workarounds compiled in.\n");
 		bad_config = 1;
 #endif
 		break;
@@ -212,29 +212,28 @@ void __init sb1250_setup(void)
 		/* Pass 2 - easiest as default for now - so many numbers */
 #if !defined(CONFIG_SB1_PASS_2_WORKAROUNDS) || \
     !defined(CONFIG_SB1_PASS_2_1_WORKAROUNDS)
-		printk("@@@@ This is a BCM1250 A3-A10 board, and the "
+		printk("This is a BCM1250 A3-A10 board, and the "
 		            "kernel doesn't have the proper workarounds "
-		            "compiled in. @@@@\n");
+		            "compiled in.\n");
 		bad_config = 1;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PREFETCH
-		printk("@@@@ Prefetches may be enabled in this kernel, "
-		            "but are buggy on this board.  @@@@\n");
+		printk("Prefetches may be enabled in this kernel, "
+		            "but are buggy on this board.\n");
 		bad_config = 1;
 #endif
 		break;
 	case K_SYS_REVISION_BCM1250_PASS2_2:
 #ifndef CONFIG_SB1_PASS_2_WORKAROUNDS
-		printk("@@@@ This is a BCM1250 B1/B2. board, and the "
+		printk("This is a BCM1250 B1/B2. board, and the "
 		            "kernel doesn't have the proper workarounds "
-		            "compiled in. @@@@\n");
+		            "compiled in.\n");
 		bad_config = 1;
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_SB1_PASS_2_1_WORKAROUNDS) || \
     !defined(CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PREFETCH)
-		printk("@@@@ This is a BCM1250 B1/B2, but the kernel is "
-		            "conservatively configured for an 'A' stepping. "
-		            "@@@@\n");
+		printk("This is a BCM1250 B1/B2, but the kernel is "
+		            "conservatively configured for an 'A' stepping.\n");
 #endif
 		break;
 	default:
-- 
1.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/