[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110813104323.GC2643@pulham.picochip.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 11:43:23 +0100
From: Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Erik Gilling <konkers@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] arm/tegra: Add device tree support to pinmux
driver
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 04:54:55PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> index 05fa1a3..33246c2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/pinmux.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>
> #include <mach/iomap.h>
> @@ -147,6 +148,41 @@ static const char *func_name(enum tegra_mux_func func)
> return tegra_mux_names[func];
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int func_enum(const char *name, enum tegra_mux_func *func_out)
> +{
> + int func;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD1")) {
> + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD1;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD2")) {
> + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD2;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD3")) {
> + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD3;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!strcmp(name, "RSVD4")) {
> + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_RSVD4;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + if (!strcmp(name, "NONE")) {
> + *func_out = TEGRA_MUX_NONE;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + for (func = 0; func < TEGRA_MAX_MUX; func++)
> + if (!strcmp(name, tegra_mux_names[func])) {
> + *func_out = func;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static const char *tri_name(unsigned long val)
> {
> @@ -666,15 +702,94 @@ void tegra_pinmux_config_pullupdown_table(const struct tegra_pingroup_config *co
> }
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static void __init tegra_pinmux_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int pg;
> +
> + for (pg = 0; pg < TEGRA_MAX_PINGROUP; pg++) {
> + const char *pg_name = pingroup_name(pg);
> + struct tegra_pingroup_config config;
> + struct device_node *pg_node;
> + int ret;
> + const char *s;
> +
> + pg_node = of_find_child_node_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node,
> + pg_name);
> + if (pg_node == NULL)
> + continue;
Rather than iterating over all of the mux names in the pinmux driver and
searching for a matching DT node, could you not do it the other way
round? So do an for_each_child_of_node() on the pinmux node then find
the matching pingroup keyed by the node name? This would eliminate
of_find_child_node_by_name(). You could also catch invalid
configurations for non-existent pins this way.
Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists