[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+rthh8WQ1KxFj+gHJ=MzdNVmLsWPQjG_-Opfd5drjR8nvdhQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 21:09:53 +0200
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
Maxim Locktyukhin <maxim.locktyukhin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto, x86: SSSE3 based SHA1 implementation for x86-64
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
> I have vague plans to clean up extended state handling and make
> kernel_fpu_begin work efficiently from any context. (i.e. the first
> kernel_fpu_begin after a context switch could take up to ~60 ns on Sandy
> Bridge, but further calls to kernel_fpu_begin would be a single branch.)
>
> The current code that handles context switches when user code is using
> extended state is terrible and will almost certainly become faster in the
> near future.
Sounds good! This would not only improve the performance of sha1_ssse3
but of aesni as well.
> Hopefully I'll have patches for 3.2 or 3.3.
>
> IOW, please don't introduce another thing like the fpu crypto module quite
> yet unless there's a good reason. I'm looking forward to deleting the fpu
> module entirely.
I've no intention to. So please go ahead and do so.
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists