[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1108142259120.4228@tiger>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:01:39 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking at
cache_alloc_refill
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.39 and 3.0. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39342
> Subject : [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking at cache_alloc_refill
> Submitter : Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
> Date : 2011-07-11 12:37 (35 days old)
> Message-ID : <201107112137.FAD00545.SHtLOFOJOMFQFV@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131038788902151&w=2
Tetsuio, did Peter's commit 30765b9 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks
before using them") and commit 83835b3 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab ->
rcu -> debug_object -> slab") in Linus' git fix this for you?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists