linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1108150927210.31525@tundra.namei.org>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:29:18 +1000 (EST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Last I looked seccomp still had a hardcoded list of system calls, but
> perhaps I've been looking in the wrong place.  However, since that's
> exactly what seccomp is -- a system call filter -- this can, and should,
> be unified that way.

Yes, we should definitely look at incorporating this into seccomp v2, 
which is still under discussion (and a topic at KS).


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/