[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-311e800e16f63d909136a64ed17ca353a160be59@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:02:17 GMT
From: tip-bot for Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, dhillf@...il.com, mgalbraith@....de,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, yong.zhang0@...il.com,
mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()
Commit-ID: 311e800e16f63d909136a64ed17ca353a160be59
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/311e800e16f63d909136a64ed17ca353a160be59
Author: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:55:20 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:00:48 +0200
sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()
Do not call dequeue_pushable_task() when failing to push an eligible
task, as it remains pushable, merely not at this particular moment.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@....de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306895385.4791.26.camel@marge.simson.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index e2698c0..8e18945 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1394,6 +1394,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *next_task;
struct rq *lowest_rq;
+ int ret = 0;
if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
return 0;
@@ -1426,7 +1427,7 @@ retry:
if (!lowest_rq) {
struct task_struct *task;
/*
- * find lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
+ * find_lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
* so it is possible that next_task has migrated.
*
* We need to make sure that the task is still on the same
@@ -1436,12 +1437,11 @@ retry:
task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
/*
- * If we get here, the task hasn't moved at all, but
- * it has failed to push. We will not try again,
- * since the other cpus will pull from us when they
- * are ready.
+ * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
+ * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
+ * to push it to. Do not retry in this case, since
+ * other cpus will pull from us when ready.
*/
- dequeue_pushable_task(rq, next_task);
goto out;
}
@@ -1460,6 +1460,7 @@ retry:
deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
+ ret = 1;
resched_task(lowest_rq->curr);
@@ -1468,7 +1469,7 @@ retry:
out:
put_task_struct(next_task);
- return 1;
+ return ret;
}
static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists