[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110815140457.e26185cd86f51defd5e562a3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:04:57 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security-testing
tree
Hi James,
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:47:23 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the security-testing tree, today's linux-next build
> (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> init/mounts.o: In function `security_old_inode_init_security':
> (.opd+0xf0): multiple definition of `security_old_inode_init_security'
> init/main.o:(.opd+0x108): first defined here
> init/mounts.o: In function `.security_old_inode_init_security':
> (.text+0x50): multiple definition of `.security_old_inode_init_security'
> init/main.o:(.text+0x110): first defined here
>
> etc ... (lots and lots)
>
> Casued by commit e1c9b23adbe8 ("evm: building without EVM enabled fixes").
>
> Please, please, build test this stuff. This is the same error that that
> patch was supposed to fix but on another function ...
>
> I have used the security-tree tree from next-20110809 again.
I am still getting this ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists