linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGTjWtD2Xz6gE6mDM6zOqDic=JZ5A9UtRzTLnUTAputc=KEZ+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 10:39:48 -0700
From:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 08/14/2011 08:23 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>
>>> No, that wouldn't work when there is more than one tag from different
>>> users.  And yes, I fully expect to see that.
>>> --
>>
>> I guess that's a NAK or at least not consensus.
>> Would you like to submit an alternative?
>>
>
> I would like to see the <id@...er> format I mentioned.

Is there a middle ground if we say:

Internal-reference-ID: <arbitrarytextforid@...er>

so

Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@...nlap>
Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@...gle>

?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/