linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Don't recursively acquire rtc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:18:03 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, hpa@...ux.intel.com,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, mjg@...hat.com,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	johnstultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Don't recursively acquire rtc_lock

On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 14:12 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Bottom line - the fix here is needed for 32-bit booting only (and
> hence isn't - afaic - as critical as I first thought). But the adjustment
> I'm holding is a necessary one (and I don't even understand why,
> when 32- and 64-bit EFI code got merged, this was left 32-bit only),
> and the NX consolidation change needs to be fixed too (basically as
> a prerequisite).

But the rtc-lock patch is independent and can be merged on its own,
right? Sure the other issues need fixing but there's no sense in holding
up the rtc-lock patch, since with it applied my machine actually boots.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/