linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:23:31 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 11:27:53 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> On 08/15/2011 10:39 AM, Mike Waychison wrote:
> >>
> >> I would like to see the <id@...er> format I mentioned.
> > 
> > Is there a middle ground if we say:
> > 
> > Internal-reference-ID: <arbitrarytextforid@...er>
> > 
> > so
> > 
> > Internal-reference-ID: <2011.0729.id1@...nlap>
> > Internal-reference-ID: <bug-45322143@...gle>
> > 
> 
> Personally I don't care if they are separate lines or all on the same line.

I don't understand how that answers Mike's question...

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/