linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOZdJXX_BS7GMtmyqiS91QByhrjANtKpbqrstR8g-L80r_N8qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:55:00 +0000
From:	Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
CC:	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c: add missing kfree

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
> index af1a5df..b6731e4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ehv_pic.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ void __init ehv_pic_init(void)
>
>        if (!ehv_pic->irqhost) {
>                of_node_put(np);
> +               kfree(ehv_pic);
>                return;
>        }

Although the fix is correct, I think there is another bug in this
function.  'np' is not released when the function finishes
successfully.   I've looked at other functions that use
irq_alloc_host(), and most of them do the same thing: they don't call
of_node_put() on the device node pointer.  The only exception I've
found is mpc5121_ads_cpld_pic_init().

Ben, Kumar: am I missing something?  irq_alloc_host() calls of_node_get():

	host->of_node = of_node_get(of_node);

so doesn't that mean that the caller of irq_alloc_host() should
release the device node pointer?

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/