linux-kernel - Re: [00/90] 3.0.2-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:24:03 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [00/90] 3.0.2-stable review

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 04:56:53PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:18:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>  > On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 12:31:28PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>  > > On 08/12/2011 11:06 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>  > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.2 release.
>  > > > There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>  > > > to this one.
>  > > 
>  > > It looks like they didn't go through to LKML. Neither for 3.0.2, nor for
>  > > .32.45, nor for .33.18. Could you resend?
>  > 
>  > Sorry, none of them got sent, that was my fault.  I've now sent them
>  > all.
> 
> Seems to be missing aba8d056078e47350d85b06a9cabd5afcc4b72ea
> which is CVE-2011-2905

It would have been nice if someone had sent that patch to
stable@...nel.org :(

I'll queue it up for the next release after this one, thanks.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/