[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E4A7BE3.5090902@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:17:07 -0700
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@...ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.1-rt11
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 09:27 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
>> Strange. By the time it got around to printing the stall, no one was
>> stalling:
>>
>> [ 100.409012] INFO: rcu_preempt_state detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 21, t=60002 jiffies)
>>
>> Now it -is- possible for the stall to end just as we get ready to detect
>> it, but that window is really really small. The most recent occurrence
>> of this sort of thing was due misconfigured timekeeping, but I don't see
>> any sign of that in the trace.
>>
>> This happens repeatedly?
>
> Yeah. When I put -rt9 on the UV box, it was doing the just idling, and
> boom thing I saw with earlier releases on both my Q6600 and x3550 M3
> boxes. -rt10 seems to have just changed the timing.
>
> I'll update the x3550 M3, and see if it still gripes. UV isn't virgin
> source, has to be twiddled a little. (symptom was identical though)
Mike,
Which test were you running? Because I'm not seeing it
on our x3550 M3..
thanks,
Nivedita
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists