[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110816174051.GG29190@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 19:40:51 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/41] xtensa: Don't reimplement force_sigsegv()
On 08/11, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> Instead of open coding the sequence from force_sigsegv() just call
> it. This also fixes a race because sa_handler was being modified
> without holding ->sighand->siglock.
The same problem with the changelog in this and the next patch.
The patch itself looks nice.
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c | 4 +---
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> index f2220b5..4f53770 100644
> --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -425,9 +425,7 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct k_sigaction *ka, siginfo_t *info,
> return;
>
> give_sigsegv:
> - if (sig == SIGSEGV)
> - ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
> - force_sig(SIGSEGV, current);
> + force_sigsegv(sig, current);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists