linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: remove eeh_event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:29:18 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@...il.com>
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/eeh: remove eeh_event_handler()->daemonize()

Hello,

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 02:24:12PM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> BTW, if someone wants to tackle a big, difficult project, one would be
> to untangle the mess that happens when the hardware underneath an
> active block device dies.  Currently, the kernel will deadlock in
> umpteen zillion places waiting for blocks and files that will never
> arrive.

Umm... that has been working fine for SCSI and ATA for years now.
Just aborting pending commands and freeing the device should do it.
Drivers need to take care of driver specific resources (per-req and
per-dev) but that's not different from aborting timed out commands.
What's missing for your use case?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/