[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110816025717.GB6511@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:57:17 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
stable@...nel.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [Stable-review] Future of the -longterm kernel releases
(i.e. how we pick them).
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 03:09:02AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> I see that you've accepted Willy Tarreau's offer to take over 2.6.32.y,
> so if you could just formalise that before /. goes wild over the looming
> end of all the above distributions, that would be nice. :-)
The distros were doing fine before any of this -stable and -longterm
stuff ever happened, so I'm sure that's not going to happen :)
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists