[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110817124339.GA10245@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:43:40 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ciju Rajan K <ciju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/1][cleanup] memcg: renaming of mem variable to memcg
Sorry for late reply
On Fri 12-08-11 12:36:23, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> The memcg code sometimes uses "struct mem_cgroup *mem" and sometimes uses
> "struct mem_cgroup *memcg". This patch renames all mem variables to memcg in
> source file.
>
> Testing : Compile tested with following configurations.
> 1) make defconfig ARCH=i386 + CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=y CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED=y
>
> Binary size Before patch
> ========================
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 8911169 520464 1884160 11315793 acaa51 vmlinux
>
> Binary Size After patch
> =======================
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 8911169 520464 1884160 11315793 acaa51 vmlinux
It would be much nicer to see unchanged md5sum. I am not sure how much
possible is this with current gcc or whether special command line
parameters have to be used (at least !CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO* is necessary)
but simple variable rename shouldn't be binary visible.
I guess that a similar approach was used during 32b and 64b x86
unification.
>
> 2) make defconfig ARCH=i386 + CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED=n
I would assume the same testing results as above
>
> 3) make defconfig ARCH=i386 CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=n
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=n CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED=n
ditto.
>
> Other sanity check:
> Bootable configuration on x86 (T60p) with CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR=y
> CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP=y CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_SWAP_ENABLED=y
> is tesed with basic mounting of memcgroup, creation of child and parallel fault.
> mkdir -p /cgroup
> mount -t cgroup none /cgroup -o memory
> mkdir /cgroup/0
> echo $$ > /cgroup/0/tasks
> time ./parallel_fault 2 100000 32
>
> real 0m0.025s
> user 0m0.001s
> sys 0m0.033s
This looks like a random test. I wouldn't add it to the changelog.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists