[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E4BEE1F.9060500@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:36:47 -0700
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tim Pepper <lnxninja@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] Nohz cpusets (was: Nohz Tasks)
On 08/15/2011 08:51 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> = What's the interface =
>
> We use the cpuset interface by adding a nohz flag to it.
> As long as a CPU is part of a nohz cpuset, then this CPU will
> try to enter into adaptive nohz mode when it can, even if it is part
> of another cpuset that is not nohz.
>
>
Why not do it unconditionally? That is, if all the conditions are
fulfilled, disable the tick regardless of any cpuset settings.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists