[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110817210554.GD14813@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 17:05:55 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp, horms@...ge.net.au,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v3 3/8] kdump: Add size to elfcorehdr kernel parameter
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with
> the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header
> in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. Current kdump architecture
> backends use different methods to do that, e.g. x86 uses the memmap= kernel
> parameter. On s390 there is no easy way to transfer this information.
> Therefore the elfcorehdr kernel parameter is extended to also pass the size.
> This now can also be used as standard mechanism by all future kdump
> architecture backends.
Michael,
This version looks much better. A quick question. Who parses this
elfcorehdr= parameter in s390 and how do we make sure these headers are not
overwritten.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists