linux-kernel - Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110817224916.GO2419@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:49:16 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > Please see the attached.
> > > 
> > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the
> > > problem nicely.  Thanks for the patch.
> > 
> > Good to hear!  I guess I should keep it, then.  ;-)
> 
> Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3?  I haven't seen
> it come across LKML yet.

I might...  But does it qualify as a regression?  That part of the
code hasn't changed for some time now.

							Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/