linux-kernel - Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110817231750.GK2227@zod.bos.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:17:50 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init

On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:02:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > > > Please see the attached.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the
> > > > > > problem nicely.  Thanks for the patch.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Good to hear!  I guess I should keep it, then.  ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3?  I haven't seen
> > > > it come across LKML yet.
> > > 
> > > I might...  But does it qualify as a regression?  That part of the
> > > code hasn't changed for some time now.
> > 
> > It's a fix for a problem that is newly surfaced in 3.1.  A regression,
> > likely not since it's been there forever, but new debugging options
> > uncovered it.  I'm pretty sure the -rc stage takes fixes even if they
> > aren't regressions.
> 
> Nope, after -rc1 only regressions fixes are taken (most of the time).

Sigh.

Look, either way I'm carrying this patch in Fedora because it fixes
a bug that is actually being reported by users (and by abrtd as well).
If you both want to wait until 3.2 to actually submit it to Linus,
then OK.

Honestly, I'm just glad we actually run with the debug options enabled
(which seems to be a rare thing) so bugs like this are actually found.
Thanks for the fix.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/