[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313654829.2128.94.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 01:07:08 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
Anish Kumar <anish198519851985@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: do not test/warn of leading whitespace
before signature tags
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 00:59 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 00:47 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 00:26 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:48 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > > From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
> > > >
> > > > Commit 2011247 introduced additional style checks for signature tags in
> > > > patches which is good. Unfortunately, now whenever patches are checked
> > > > by piping the output of 'git show' or 'stg show' through checkpatch it
> > > > warns not to use whitespace before all signature tags since these (and the
> > > > rest of the patch description) are indented. Remove this test/warning.
> > >
> > > I think this is not a good idea.
> > >
> > > checkpatch is meant for patches not git log output.
> > > indenting signatures can cause other problems later.
> > >
> > > I think you can avoid this easily by using checkpatch
> > > option --ignore=BAD_SIGN_OFF when using git log output
> > > as input.
> >
> > The problem I have with this is that the sign-off's are not bad, they
> > are by default indented by 'git show' or 'stg show' so checkpatch.pl
> > should handle the "default" formatting of git/stg and if there is
> > additional indenting not expected, then the sign-off's should be
> > considered bad.
>
> I disagree.
>
> checkpatch should handle the default input of patches
> as best it can.
>
> I suppose checkpatch could have a different "--input=git"
> or some such to avoid certain things that git might produce
> that a patch would not.
That does sound an alternative which would be acceptable.
>
> Deleting useful checks for patches isn't a good idea.
>
> > If this option is added, then if there were "real"
> > problems with the sign-off, it would not be displayed.
>
> So what?
>
> It would also be too late to do anything about
> it anyway as it would already be committed.
If you are running it on patches already committed to maintainers tree,
but if you are running checkpatch.pl on a patch on your local tree
before you send it out, you can correct any changes necessary.
>
> > > You could also use:
> > > git log --format="commit %H%nAuthor: %an <%ae>%nDate: %aD%n%n%s%n%n%b"
> > > so that you get the current default --format=medium
> > > output without indenting the commit log body.
> > Even doing this does not resolve the "false" warnings" that
> > checkpatch.pl produces regarding the sign-off's.
>
> I tried it. It works for me.
> What about it doesn't work for you?
>
I did the following using David Miller's net-next tree...
git log -1 > ../test.patch
./scripts/checkpatch.pl ../test.patch
and I get the following:
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Signed-off-by:
#9:
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Acked-by:
#10:
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Acked-by:
#11:
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Cc:
#12:
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@...escale.com>
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Cc:
#13:
Cc: socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Cc:
#14:
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Cc:
#15:
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Cc:
#16:
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
WARNING: Do not use whitespace before Signed-off-by:
#17:
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
ERROR: Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch
total: 1 errors, 9 warnings, 0 lines checked
../test.patch has style problems, please review.
If any of these errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists