linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1313665755.2311.57.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:09:15 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] signal: Use set_current_blocked()

On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 23:17 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
> 
> This does look like a decent clean up, especially because so many
> architectures got this sequence wrong in the past. But yeah, it will
> require me to rewrite half my series ;-)
> 
> Is it worth rewriting the series? Dunno. I'm not convinced that the
> wrapper buys us enough for that, plus it'd increase the number of
> patches.
> 
> Maybe it'd be better to do it as a separate set of patches?

OK so, I went ahead and rewrote the series using your clean up. It's in
the 'oleg/set-current-blocked-v2' branch at, 

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfleming/linux-2.6.git

Would you mind taking a quick look and see which series you prefer? I'll
wait for your reply before I resend any patches.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/