[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWPaavsa7gSURP5CL8+Es2P5rEdtLRmrOx+wQkThX7v9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:51:10 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-numa@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Piszcz <ap@...arrain.com>
Subject: Re: 3.1-rc2: CONFIG_NUMA Question
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a SuperMicro X8DTH-6F motherboard with 2 cpus it has NUMA options in
> the BIOS; what parameters/should I be using for the NUMA options in the
> kernel?
>
> | | [*] Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support | |
> | | [ ] Old style AMD Opteron NUMA detection | |
> | | [*] ACPI NUMA detection | |
> | | [ ] NUMA emulation | |
> | | (6) Maximum NUMA Nodes (as a power of 2) | |
>
That is Intel processor, right? If so, the things you selected here are enough,
the rest two is not what you need.
> Specifically, the maximum number of NUMA nodes? Will this help to increase
> performance of large memory allocations/is there any downside
> to enabling this feature?
The max of NUMA nodes is specified by CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT,
in your case, it is 6, which means it supports up to 2^6 nodes.
If your hardware supports NUMA, yes, that certainly help to increase
the performance.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists