[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110818115921.GA20085@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:59:21 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86_32_early_logical_apicid() -> one warning per CPU on
late-determined BIGSMP systems
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:54:10PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 12.08.11 at 12:15, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Ooh, okay, bigsmp switches apic pretty late in the init. Wouldn't it
> > be better to move that to right after dmi init regardless of this
> > problem?
>
> No, because this depends on knowing num_possible_cpus(), which
> in turn can't be done until after the firmware tables got parsed (and
> that's where the ->x86_32_early_logical_apicid() call happens).
OIC, switching apic that late seems rather nasty. Eh well... :(
> > So, yeah, please go ahead and remove it.
>
> There are quite a few references to this, and some from code that
> if I change it I would have no way of testing (Summit, ES7000, NUMAQ).
> So no, I don't think I'm in the position to do this cleanup (if it really is
> just that).
>
> So for the time being I'll put together a patch re-writing
> early_per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_logical_apicid, ...) right after overriding
> apic_default with apic_bigsmp.
Yeap, sure. We'll need less invasive for -stable anyway. I'll kill
the method afterwards.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists