linux-kernel - Re: pstore: change mutex locking to spin

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1313678271.2212.5.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:37:51 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: pstore: change mutex locking to spin_locks

On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 08:58 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> Probably the raw_spin_* stuff.  I think those purposely avoid the lockdep
> mechanisms. 

Nope, raw_spin_* is covered by lockdep just fine. Also anything
purposely avoiding lockdep is bound to be a piece of crap :-)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/