linux-kernel - Re: Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E4D642F.3010909@nod.at>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:12:47 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 00/91] pending uml patches

Al,

Am 18.08.2011 20:58, schrieb Al Viro:
>
> My apologies for mailbomb from hell.  *All* this stuff is available in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/um-header.git/ #master,
> but since uml folks had been stuck with mail and patch for a long time...

Have you touched your patches since yesterday?
I've already pulled and uploaded them to my shiny new git repo at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rw/linux-um.git unstable

Due to the current mirroring problems with git.kernel.org I have not 
sent made it public.
Sorry for that, I screwed it. :-(

> Anyway, most of the stuff in this pile is merging, cleaning and mutilating
> subarchitecture-related code in arch/um.  By the end of it we have x86
> bits largely merged between 32bit and 64bit variants and taken to arch/x86/um;
> headers seriously cleaned up and mostly free of x86-isms now (not completely -
> we still have page size dependencies in there).
>
> Beginning of the series are pure build and driver fixes; those should go to
> Linus before 3.1-final, IMO.

Okay.

> As far as I know, there's no regressions introduced by that pile; testing
> and comments would be, of course, welcome.
>

There was a small build regression, I've already fixed it!

Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/