[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1313698168.2311.58.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:09:28 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@...drovec.name>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/41] ncpfs: Use set_current_blocked()
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 19:05 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> OK. I guess nobody cares. Matt, could you redo your original patch?
> just remove ->siglock and convert it to use set_current_blocked()
> leaving this logic alone.
Sure, will do.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists