| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110818215540.GA14098@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:55:40 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:23:34PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 02:00:34PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:35:23 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:17:50PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:06:44AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:02:19PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 03:49:16PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:20:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:04:17AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > Please see the attached.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Fixed it up quickly to apply on top of -rc2 and it seems to solve the
> > > > > > > > > > problem nicely. Thanks for the patch.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Good to hear! I guess I should keep it, then. ;-)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey Paul, were you going to send this to Linus for -rc3? I haven't seen
> > > > > > > > it come across LKML yet.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I might... But does it qualify as a regression? That part of the
> > > > > > > code hasn't changed for some time now.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's a fix for a problem that is newly surfaced in 3.1. A regression,
> > > > > > likely not since it's been there forever, but new debugging options
> > > > > > uncovered it. I'm pretty sure the -rc stage takes fixes even if they
> > > > > > aren't regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Nope, after -rc1 only regressions fixes are taken (most of the time).
> > > >
> > > > Sigh.
> > > >
> > > > Look, either way I'm carrying this patch in Fedora because it fixes
> > > > a bug that is actually being reported by users (and by abrtd as well).
> > > > If you both want to wait until 3.2 to actually submit it to Linus,
> > > > then OK.
> > > >
> > > > Honestly, I'm just glad we actually run with the debug options enabled
> > > > (which seems to be a rare thing) so bugs like this are actually found.
> > > > Thanks for the fix.
> > >
> > > I am sorry, but I didn't make the rules! And I must carry the fix
> > > longer as well, if that makes you feel any better.
> >
> > bah, we're not that anal. The patch fixes a bug and prevents a nasty
> > warning spew. Please, send it to Linus.
>
> Given your Acked-by and Josh's Tested-by I might consider it. ;-)
>
> Speaking of which, Josh, does this patch help Nicolas and Michal?
>
> > We appear to be referring to the patch "rcu: Avoid having just-onlined
> > CPU resched itself when RCU is idle"? If so, the changelog doesn't
> > even mention that the patch fixes a scheduling-while-atomic warning and
> > the changelog fails to refer to the redhat bug report. These omissions
> > should be repaired, please.
>
> OK... But I cannot bring myself to believe that my fix does more than
> hide some other bug. Which is OK, I will just say that in the changelog.
And here is this patch ported to v3.1-rc2, FYI.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
rcu: Avoid having just-onlined CPU resched itself when RCU is idle
CPUs set rdp->qs_pending when coming online to resolve races with
grace-period start. However, this means that if RCU is idle, the
just-onlined CPU might needlessly send itself resched IPIs. Adjust the
online-CPU initialization to avoid this, and also to correctly cause
the CPU to respond to the current grace period if needed.
This patch is believed to fix or otherwise suppress problems in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726877, however, the
relationship is not apparent to this patch's author.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index ba06207..6986d34 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1865,8 +1865,6 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible)
/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */
- rdp->qs_pending = 1; /* so set up to respond to current GP. */
rdp->beenonline = 1; /* We have now been online. */
rdp->preemptible = preemptible;
rdp->qlen_last_fqs_check = 0;
@@ -1891,8 +1889,15 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible)
rnp->qsmaskinit |= mask;
mask = rnp->grpmask;
if (rnp == rdp->mynode) {
- rdp->gpnum = rnp->completed; /* if GP in progress... */
+ /*
+ * If there is a grace period in progress, we will
+ * set up to wait for it next time we run the
+ * RCU core code.
+ */
+ rdp->gpnum = rnp->completed;
rdp->completed = rnp->completed;
+ rdp->passed_quiesc = 0;
+ rdp->qs_pending = 1;
rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rnp->completed - 1;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists