linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E4CA6B4.5060807@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Aug 2011 13:44:20 +0800
From:	Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
CC:	JJ Ding <jj_ding@....com.tw>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Aaron Huang <aaron_huang@....com.tw>,
	Tom Lin <tom_lin@....com.tw>,
	Eric Piel <E.A.B.Piel@...elft.nl>,
	Chase Douglas <chase.douglas@...onical.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...l.unipv.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Input: elantech - add v3 hardware support

On 08/18/2011 01:34 PM, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Wanlong Gao<gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>  wrote:
>> On 08/18/2011 01:26 PM, JJ Ding wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Wanlong Gao,
>>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 11:01:52 +0800, Wanlong Gao<gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 08/18/2011 09:57 AM, JJ Ding wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> v3 hardware's packet format is almost identical to v2 (one/three finger
>>>>> touch),
>>>>> except when sensing two finger touch, the hardware sends 12 bytes of
>>>>> data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: JJ Ding<jj_ding@....com.tw>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    Documentation/input/elantech.txt |  104 ++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>    drivers/input/mouse/elantech.c   |  218
>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>    drivers/input/mouse/elantech.h   |   11 ++
>>>>>    3 files changed, 303 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> +static int determine_packet_v3(struct psmouse *psmouse)
>>>>
>>>> elantech_check_parity_v1
>>>> packet_simple_check_v2
>>>> determine_packet_v3
>>>>
>>>> Why not consistent them?
>>>
>>> OK, how do these names sound to you?
>>>
>>> elantech_check_parity_v1
>>> elantech_packet_check_v2
>>> elantech_packet_check_v3
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> jj
>>
>> Yeah, sounds perfectly.
>
> Or just:
>
> elantech_packet_check_v1
> elantech_packet_check_v2
> elantech_packet_check_v3
>
> :)

Hmm... maybe they can go into an elantech_packet_check()?
like:
case 1:
	...
case 2:
	...
What do you think? ;)

Thanks
-Wanlong Gao
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/