[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110819011431.GB20747@verge.net.au>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:14:32 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: vgoyal@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
oomichi@....nes.nec.co.jp, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] kdump: Add external kdump entry point for s390
stand-alone dump tools
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 02:39:44PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> Hello Vivek,
>
> I finished the patches that add the stand-alone dump tools support on
> top of the recently sent v2 patch series. The following three patches
> implement the program check idea that we have discussed recently:
>
> [1] kdump: Add new machine_kexec_finish() architecture callback
> [2] s390: Add external kdump entry point for s390 stand-alone dump tools
> [3] kexec-tools: Emit program check on s390 for checksum failure
Hi Michael,
in general I am fine with these patches and happy to merge them
although I am a little unclear about the status of the kernel side of
things. Please let me know if you would like me to merge the kexec-tools
patches now or wait a bit (for an updated version?).
Also, if you could give me any pointers on how to obtain an s390
cross-compiling environment for x86_64 I would be most grateful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists