linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] dmaengine: at

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:45:04 +0530
From:	"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	"'linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] dmaengine: at_hdmac fixes for next

On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 15:04 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 19/08/2011 14:53, Koul, Vinod :
> > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:56 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >> Vinod,
> >>
> >> Please pull from:
> >>
> >>   git://github.com/at91linux/linux-2.6-at91.git nfe/sdma_at_hdmac
> >>
> >> to receive latest updates for the Atmel at_hdmac dmaengine driver. Those changes are made on top of current linus' git tree (v3.1-rc2-59-g5bad33c).
> >> The patches below have been discussed on the linux-arm-kernel mailing-list.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Nicolas Ferre (4):
> >>       dmaengine: at_hdmac: replace spin_lock* with irqsave variants
> >>       dmaengine: at_hdmac: improve power management routines
> >>       dmaengine: at_hdmac: add wrappers for testing channel state
> >>       dmaengine: at_hdmac: fix way to specify cyclic capability
> >>
> >>  drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c      |  159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>  drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h |   24 +++++++
> >>  2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>
> > Hi Nicolas,
> > 
> > I tried to merge your branch, but I also get lot on unwanted commits :(
> > Looks like this branch is based on current Linus's tree, I typically
> > base my next on rc-X and not any random commit.
> 
> Yes, I am sorry for that and realize that it can be a mess for you... I
> will take the habit to cling to a -rcX for my pull requests.
> 
> > Either you can rebase to latest rc-X and I will merge, or since I
> > created a test branch I can extract your 4 patches and apply to my next.
> 
> If you have a test branch close at hand you can extract my patches.
> Thanks for your help.
Okay, Applied, it should be pushing out now :)

yes I always create test branch for applying patches and do a ff merge
to next. That makes my workspace easy to manage and discard if anything
in my checks go wrong


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/